Step One Redux

Interesting, the debate in which I found myself today, in light of yesterday's post. Or more specifically, in light of Item Number One in Philip Zimbardo's Seven Social Processes: "Mindlessly Taking the First Small Step".

The Pocono Record, our local Newspaper, reported today on the progress of a Pennsylvania bill that would require colleges and universities to report any incidence of underage drinking to the parents of the guilty party. My point in the debate: the State just doesn't have any business making such demands of a private institution. Not to mention it is inconsistent. What about other crimes? What about 18 to 20 year olds who don't go to college? Who's going to call their Mommy and Daddy?

It was said in the State's defence that requiring additional parental involvment wasn't the end of the world, and that 18 year olds aren't as mature as they used to be because they're insulated from the world.

So let's insulate them even more by treating them like... kids? I don't get it. And I also don't get how it is ok to allow the State to legislate in this area. As I said:

So again, we come back to the idea of deterrent. How much are we going to allow the State to take away in the name of keeping us safe? You see this blatantly inconsistent law as a good way to stop kids from drinking. It very well may be, although I do have my doubts. But what's next? Because the State really, REALLY wants to keep you safe. Safe from the risks associated with the personal responsibility of true freedom, that is.

(Is it pretentious to quote myself? Yes. Yes, it is.)

In any event, it appears to me to be another case of letting the State do what it wants because they're Just Keeping Us Safe. And that, my cherished and wonderful readers, is Taking the First Small Step. Again.

Slippery Slope

According to Philip Zimbardo, who speaks with some authority on the matter (and has written a book on it), these are the "Seven Social Processes That Grease the Slippery Slope of Evil":

1. Mindlessly Taking the First Small Step
2. Dehumanization of Others
3. De-individuation of Self
4. Diffusion of Personal Responsibility
5. Blind Obedience to Authority
6. Uncritical Conformity to Group Norms
7. Passive Tolerance of Evil Through Inaction, or Indifference

How many of these have we already taken as individuals... and thus, as a nation? And what do we need to do in order to take a few steps back?

Deep Breaths

Ok, you're right. My posts have gotten a little... oh, I don't know... shall we say, Michael-Douglas-In-Falling-Down. It's time for a little breather. (In case you forgot my previous breather, please take a look. In with the good, out with the bad.)

Without further delay, Kevlar Ideas is proud to bring you Stefan G. Bucher's Daily Monster...

Dollar Karma

From The Washington Post:

"'Euros Only' reads a handmade sign in Billy's Antiques & Props on East Houston Street in Manhattan. But that's really just an attention grabber. Actually, owner Billy Leroy explains, the store will accept Canadian dollars and British pounds, and U.S. dollars, too."
[Thanks to J.D. Tuccille over at Disloyal Opposition for bringing this one to my attention.]

Now I'm no economist, but humor me for just a little while. This so-called stimulus package - you know, the thing that is going to save the day - is meant to inject dollars into the nation's economic bloodstream. And then what? Well, let's watch the paper trail: we print money to give to consumers. Consumers spend their money on imported goods (because next to nothing is made here anymore). Those dollars float across the pond (or North into the lands of the Maple Tree People), and if those stimulating dollars come back to us, they are reincarnated... as Euros? And Pounds? And... Canadian Dollars!!?? Hey, wait a minute! Where did all that stimulus money go?

Oh, never mind - it doesn't matter! What the shopkeepers won't accept in foreign currency, we'll create from absolutely nothing anyway. So go out and spend, Mr. and Mrs. American! It's what keeps the wheels turning! And if you think about it just a little too much, hey... that's what television is for. Shhhhhh! Go back to sleep.

A Brave New Virtual World

And in "I Can't Believe It's Not April Fools Day" news, the Federal Government is now officially grasping at straws. According to a report from the Director of National Intelligence (a misnomer of mind-numbing proportions), those slippery terrorists aren't going to be able to hide anywhere - and neither are you.

Via Wired:

"Having eliminated all terrorism in the real world, the U.S. intelligence community is working to develop software that will detect violent extremists infiltrating World of Warcraft and other massive multiplayer games... The Reynard project will begin by profiling online gaming behavior, then potentially move on to its ultimate goal of 'automatically detecting suspicious behavior and actions in the virtual world.'"

I couldn't believe this myself, but sure enough, it checks out. Of special hilarity, at least to me, is the part where the report talks about identifying "social, behavioral and cultural norms in virtual worlds and gaming environments." These people really don't have a clue, do they?

So what do you think? Spooks in cyberspace are going to be profiling 13 year olds and their online "norms", all in the name of Homeland Security. Is this even remotely rational?

Degrading Society

In his book Spook Country, William Gibson uses an unlikely character to give us the following truth:

"A nation consists of its laws. A nation does not consist of its situation at a given time. If an individual's morals are situational, that individual is without morals. If a nation's laws are situational, that nation has no laws, and soon isn't a nation. Are you really so scared of terrorists that you'll dismantle the structures that made America what it is? If you are, you let the terroist win. Because that is exactly, specifically, his goal, his only goal: to frighten you into surrendering the rule of law. That's why they call him 'terrorist.' He uses terrifying threats to induce you to degrade your own society." (italics mine)

Ah yes, the Rule of Law. The glue by which the pieces of civilization are held together. When that unifying force is tampered with (and in today's case, ignored), the structure falls apart.

"...the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with written, publicly disclosed laws adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process. The principle is intended to be a safeguard against arbitrary governance, whether by a totalitarian leader or by mob rule. Thus, the rule of law is hostile both to dictatorship and to anarchy." --http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

So if we see someone "evincing a design" to diminish the rule of law, can we not conclude that there is a good chance they or the people they represent are interested in one of these two things, dictatorship or anarchy?

Let me know what you think.

A Disconnect

Today's breath of fresh air comes to us from Jacob Halbrooks over at lewrockwell.com:

"In a system where government activities are only funded voluntarily and at direct cost to those contributing, we would find the true mandate of the people for financing specific policies of the government. Likely, we would find an end to the welfare/warfare state and an army of bureaucrats seeking other employment."

I've been looking for a way out of really hating my fellow American. I'm not a hateful person - in fact, I'm pretty sure I don't hate anyone. And yet, when I look at the mounds of incredibly undeniable evidence that the Average Joe is not only just plain dim, but also seems to be proactively seeking the demise of our Republic... my non-hate starts to go into the red zone. (You are obviously not one of the aforementioned Dims, since you have the good sense to use a few minutes of your day and park yourself in front of this wondrous blog of mine. You, in fact, are among the Anti-Dim. Congratulations, and good luck.)

Needless to say, I was much relieved when I read Mr. Halbrooks' article, because it allows me to regain trust in my buddy, Mr. Joe, and instead point the condemning finger at something more discernibly Bad. I speak, of course, of The System.

When there is a complete disconnect between Government policy and the American pocketbook, how in the world can I get mad at any of my poor comrade schleps? If we were able to vote with our money, how different would this country be! As I see it, the source of this disconnect takes two primary forms: the IRS, and the Federal Reserve. We are compelled to pay for whatever the Government says we should pay for. And hot-off-the-presses "assets" make up whatever the difference is between the total bill and what couldn't be stolen from us.

Along these same lines is the sidestepping done by the Executive Branch (and the ignorance of Congress for allowing it) when Congress's Constitutionally-granted power to declare war was diluted, and the President given the ability to authorize "Military Force". The Founders knew that War and The People were inexorably linked. Congress is meant to be the voice of the People in our government. How much would we be debating this so-called "War In Iraq" if the President needed to ask us to fund it? Can you imagine a Fundraising Drive to pay for Mr. Bush's "War"? (The Government could hire the Girl Scouts, but they'd probably charge $40 per box. Oh, and a box would consist of three and a half cookies. They might allow a discount - to stimulate the economy - but you'd need to fill out a 28 page form first.) But none of this is of any concern, because we each pay our taxes, and the Fed prints up the rest.

"Good people can vote for evil because the political process spreads the cost of evil to everyone... As long as people recognize the authority of government to fund itself on their behalf, the regime will continue."

So rest easy tonight, Mr. and Mrs. American. I do not hate you - yet. Just open your eyes, or else.

Ssssssssssss

As if we don't have enough to worry about...(Link)

Wait, are terrorists behind this? I think someone should call DHS and find out. Maybe we need a new threat level indexing system...?

Drip Drip

Politics
Originally uploaded by Con Mis Ojos Photography

Why do so few hear the water running? And who left it on in the first place?

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: 1000 pcs.

Is anyone watching this puzzle come together? The more pieces that get set into place, the more the picture becomes discernable. I'm hoping that some klutz will come by and knock the table over, or spill a gallon or two of coffee on it. Something, anything, other than what's taking shape.

Planes (Link)

According to a US document being circulated for signature in European capitals, EU states would also need to supply personal data on all air passengers overflying but not landing in the US in order to gain or retain visa-free travel to America, senior EU officials said.

And within months the US department of homeland security is to impose a new permit system for Europeans flying to the US, compelling all travellers to apply online for permission to enter the country before booking or buying a ticket, a procedure that will take several days.

Washington is also asking European airlines to provide personal data on non-travellers - for example family members - who are allowed beyond departure barriers to help elderly, young or ill passengers to board aircraft flying to America, a demand the airlines reject as "absurd".

Trains (Link)

Amtrak will start randomly screening passengers' carry-on bags this week in a new security push that includes officers with automatic weapons and bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling platforms and trains.

Amtrak plans to roll out the new "mobile security teams" first on the Northeast Corridor between Washington and Boston, the railroad's most heavily used route, before expanding them to the rest of the country.

The teams will show up unannounced at stations and set up baggage screening areas in front of boarding gates. Officers will randomly pull people out of line and wipe their bags with a special swab that is then put through a machine that detects explosives. If the machine detects anything, officers will open the bag for visual inspection. Anybody who is selected for screening and refuses will not be allowed to board and their ticket will be refunded.

Automobiles (Link)

(Ok, this heading was a bit of a stretch, but not by too much. It's about the so-called Real ID, which does have to do with automobiles. So my clever title is still intact. I know you were worried.)

Residents of the five states--Maine, South Carolina, Montana, Oklahoma, and New Hampshire--that have firmly rejected Real ID [will have trouble flying or entering federal buildings starting May 11]. Fifteen states and the District of Columbia have not decided yet, meaning they could fall into this category too.

The text of the law says that, starting May 11, "a federal agency may not accept, for any official purpose, a driver's license or identification card issued by a state to any person unless the state is meeting the requirements of this section." Official purpose is defined to include "any other purposes" that Homeland Security thinks is wise.

[Regarding the possibility of a wider application of the law, Homeland Security had this to say.] "DHS will continue to consider additional ways in which a Real ID license can or should be used and will implement any changes to the definition of 'official purpose' or determinations regarding additional uses for Real ID consistent with applicable laws and regulatory requirements. DHS does not agree that it must seek the approval of Congress as a prerequisite to changing the definition in the future." [italics mine]

The scary thing here is that it doesn't even matter if the pieces don't fit. Anything can be made to fit, under the right circumstances. Like a complete lack of checks and balances, for example.

A Modest Proposal

I wish I had one of those cartoon-handed "Return to Sender" stamps, preferably in red ink, so when my Federal Tupperware comes in the mail (you know, the one that contains my Piece of the Pie), I could cartoonishly rubber stamp it and zing it right back the way it came. But who am I kidding, I'll never have a stamp like that. I can't afford one.

The whole "stimulus" idea is a diversion, of course. As is explained here (albeit in slightly different words), all good diversions are based on misunderstanding (a.k.a. "deception"):

It seems that Washington wants us to believe that they have some magic machine that can turn up $150 billion in new assets without anyone having to do anything to make these assets appear. One wonders, then, why we need to wait until a recession to stimulate the economy. Why not magically create hundreds of billions every day, and not just for this country but for the entire world? Why are we holding back?

Indeed. Let's allow this logic to continue for a bit, because it gets better. Along these same lines, our Mr. President offered us the following wisdom (as archived here on MSNBC, about four minutes in):

"I think actually the spending on the war might help with jobs, because we're buying equipment and people are working. I think this economy is down because we built too many houses."

If you're asking yourself to believe that these are his words... Look, I can't make this stuff up. Following this simple logic to its sublime conclusion, we should not only attempt to really stimulate the economy by blowing up as many countries as we can, we should also start dropping bombs on our own houses. No, really, this is a good idea. Think of all the jobs the rebuilding would create! Those pesky houses are like rabbits anyway - first you have two, then before you know it there's an entire development.

But I digress, and painfully so.

Federalism Kills Zombies

Again, I'm going on and on about our government and how we need to start thinking about it, for crying out loud. (And if I was podcasting, you could hear me literally crying out loud. Maybe I'll do that for you soon.) I'm very sorry for the histrionics, but there's something out there that it seems nobody wants to think about anymore. It's called Federalism, and our country was founded on the principle.

So let's push this spooky idea out into the light where zombies die and vampires turn to dust.

Robert Hawes, the man behind The Jeffersonian, one of the world's most erudite and well thought-out blogs, possessing an excellence I and this page can only hope to reach one day (how am I doing, Mr. Hawes?) wrote the following. Imagine if these words had been said by a presidential candidate during any of the debates this election season:

“Americans are clearly not of one mind on every issue, so why should we have to live under the same laws? Imagine an America where California and Virginia could agree to disagree on the issue of abortion. Imagine if Massachusetts and South Carolina could agree to disagree on the issue of gay marriage. Imagine being able to go to the polls and cast a vote on such important issues without having to worrying about being overruled by a federal judge!

“Our founding fathers understood that not everyone wanted to live under the same laws. That’s why they crafted our Constitution so that the federal government had only certain, specific powers, and everything else was left up to the states, to be decided as their people saw fit. Today, though, politicians in Washington use our tax dollars to try and force us all to live by their edicts, by what they and their special interest friends want for us, instead of how we ourselves would choose to live. They want power. They want control. But they can only have these things if we let them. We can take the reins of our lives back again, if we will. By disempowering Washington we empower ourselves. Your choice is clear tonight [points to the other candidates]: you can choose his plan for your life, or his plan for your life, or his plan for your life, or my plan to give you back your life.”

See, the thing about the undead is that they just amble on, oblivious to their parts hanging akimbo, their blank stares serving as a macabre evidence of everything they've forgotten. Let's try to not get like that, shall we?

Consent

58 years ago on this very day, the 17th of February 1950, James Warburg (whose father Paul was a chief architect of the Federal Reserve System) stood before the US Senate and said the following:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

Later, in 2002, David Rockefeller (American banker extraordinaire) wrote in his book, Memoirs:

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

And now to complete my narrative, all disjointed and Pulp Fiction style, is a certain Mr. Thomas Jefferson dead and gone, who had this to say on the matter:

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

If I have your attention, please take a look at this page. If you do, you will see a tidy summary of John McCain's top contributors for the 2008 Presidential election cycle. Notice anything? Banks. Banks. More banks. Egad, a pattern. In fact, if you add up the numbers, contributions from "Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate" account for 28% of his funding, making it the largest contributing sector.

What does it all mean?

Rats Invade Sweden!

Be very careful deciding what you want from your government.

Sweden is generally credited for having established a functional and economically friendly recycling program... until you talk to the Swedes themselves. As one such Swede says:

The structure works the way all centrally planned structures work: it increases and centralizes power while the attempted (expected) results do not materialize. In this case, the structure works: people do sort their trash in different bins — they have no choice. Also, government garbage collection companies do not have to do as much work while getting paid more than ever before.

A recent problem with the garbage-collection centers is that the containers aren't emptied very often (a typical example of government "savings") and thus remain full, which means that people's garbage piles up next to the overflowing containers while the government contractors sit idle: they are only paid to empty the containers on schedule, not to pick up the trash sitting next to these containers. The result? Disease and rats. Newspapers have been reporting on a "rat invasion" in Stockholm and in other Swedish cities in recent years.

If we consider the costs in monetary terms, in terms of wasted time, and in terms of increased emissions from automobiles, this is hardly environmentally friendly. Adding the annoyance and the increased risk for disease, Swedish recycling is at least as disastrous as any other government scheme.

So what we have here is another example of a government responding to what the people think they need... kind of like healthcare. Except that there is a disconnect between what the people want and what the people get. The Swedes wanted to help the environment. What they got was rats and frustration. The thing that is supposed to bridge the gap is a nifty little thing we've lost faith in: The Free Market. Market forces provide the connection between cause and effect, supply and demand, public desire and private enterprise. Imagine the mess we'd have if our government had been tasked with getting a cell phone into each and every one of our greedy little hands. Lucky for me and my Samsung Blackjack II, such was not the case.

If we're going to elect a president who believes it is government's job to use our money to accomplish... well, whatever the hell it wants in the name of the greater good, then we better be laying out the traps. The rats are on their way, and good luck trying to get them to recycle.

An Alternative

I thoughtfully decided against posting this yesterday, since the celebration of everyone's favorite beheaded Saint(s) was in full swing. But now that the day has passed and chocolate makers everywhere can take a vacation on your dime (if you properly demonstrated your devotion to the special someone in your life, that is), I submit the following for your review as the first entry in what I shall profoundly designate my "Humbug" series:

St. Skeletor's Day

Pass the Rum

Here's a very good article on our ship of state, for the more stalwart among you. For the rest of you, fear not, I have saved the day and done your reading for you. The tasty bits:

America can be likened to a cruise ship that is taking on water faster than it can be bailed out. If the issue in your mind is whether the ship’s captain is female, or black, or is willing to offer more free services while on your cruise, or wants to mount more machine guns on the deck to deter terrorists, you are completely distracted from the imminent crisis that confronts America. The ship’s captain may continue to issue assurances from the helm, but not only is the boat taking on water, it is headed for an iceberg! The news media is akin to the public address system on the ship. Keep the people distracted from the real danger that lies ahead. No sense panicking the customers.

The article goes on to point out the icebergs: $60 trillion of unfunded obligations for Medicare and Social Security, the military state costing us over $1 trillion a year (some estimate $2.65 trillion when you figure in debt payments for prior wars), and the nonsensical way we circulate increasingly copious amount of Monopoly money. The point is that we damn well better look at the things that matter when we're deciding for whom we should vote. If we don't, if we instead allow ourselves to be concerned with gender or color or ideologies that have no constitutional basis within the executive branch or the myriad of other items we're told to worry about, then the article's conclusion will hold true:

Go ahead, vote for your favorite candidate. Sink the American ship of state for sure. You have now been informed. To continue to ignore this deception makes you a party to the crime. Pirates have boarded the ship and taken the helm and you are aiding and abetting them.

Avast, ye scurvy dogs! Hoist the mainsail! Man yer posts, or Davy Jones' Locker be waitin' for ya by rights! And I'll warrant ya, the deep sure not be choosy.

12,008

Some of my loyal subscribers may be scratching their heads about yesterday's post, saying, "I thought there was supposed to be absurdity. I want my absurdity!" To these distressed individuals, I offer my apologies. The embedded video apparently didn't embed itself very well into the electrothreads that are woven together to form emails. So here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gNktI3AF4Q

---

As for today's post, this was all too easy. A huge Booyah to my favorite expatriate, William Gibson, for bringing this gem to my attention. (Check out his books!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gwqEneBKUs

1st Law of Absurdodynamics

Just to prove that absurdity is not solely confined to the realm of politics (although there is no denying that it is concentrated heavily in the area of Mr. McCain), I am refusing to comment on anything political in today's post.

Fear not, the level of absurdity will be maintained nonetheless...




See? As we know, the law of conservation of the absurd states that absurdity can neither be created nor destroyed - it can only be changed from one form into another.

Tactful Negotiation

I happened on an interesting little tidbit of shoot-from-the-hip jocularity from the madcap world of Mr. McCain. It's a little dated (May 28, 2006), but oh-so-illustrative nonetheless:

For all the national attention surrounding John McCain’s two highly anticipated, protest-ridden commencement speeches in New York last week, the Senator actually saved some of his best material for the crowd that gathered on Friday behind closed doors in the back of the Regency Hotel.

In a small, mirror-paneled room guarded by a Secret Service agent and packed with some of the city’s wealthiest and most influential political donors, Mr. McCain got right to the point.

“One of the things I would do if I were President would be to sit the Shiites and the Sunnis down and say, ‘Stop the bullshit,’” said Mr. McCain, according to Shirley Cloyes DioGuardi, an invitee, and two other guests.
--source: The New York Observer, http://www.observer.com/node/38920

Does anyone else choke on their force-fed McCain propaganda when they read this, or is it just me?

So let me get this straight. Somewhere there is a group of people (of like mind with Mr. Bush, by the way, a leader who has never steered us wrong in the past) that think we are honestly supposed to vote for a guy whose bright idea on Mid East peace is to tell everybody down there to just knock it off…? Well gosh. I wish somebody had thought of that before! There isn’t already enough swagger in our foreign policy; we need to go in there cursing and show those third-worlders who’s boss!

Surreal.

The Dish

"Wo nsa da mu a, wonni nnya wo."

-- "If your hands are in the dish, people do not eat everything and leave you nothing."

This symbol and its associated meaning is called an Adinkra. Take a look... http://www.welltempered.net/adinkra/. (My apologies to Ghana if I'm misusing the plural form. I'm a little rusty in my African linguistics.) According to my friends at Wikipedia, "Adinkra are symbols common in Western African societies, particularly the Akan people of Ghana, that represent concepts or aphorisms."

In other words, it's a little like when you're looking at a sign and you see the triangular outline of a skirt - you know the ladies' room is right around the corner. Or how those golden arches mean "loveless food crafted to make you large and unconcerned".

Anyway, what those savvy Akan folks in Ghana are getting at is the idea of participation, with respect in this case to government. If you don't want the bum end of the deal, get in there and start fighting. If you didn't notice (and I know you did, because I trust you), I like the idea so much I'm using it for the symbol of the pretty little blog you see before you. I drove through some mean snow and ice today to sign some petitions that will do some good things for my candidate and his delegates. Today, I had my hand in the dish. There are far too few people deciding the fate of far too many others, and that's one part of why we're in this mess now.

But one thing that doesn't quite get summed up neatly in original saying is that you darn well better know what dish you've gone and got your paws into. We think with the collective mind of the media. We let other people, people with vested interests alien to our well-being, make up our minds and our "truths". I'm not talking about conspiracies, I'm talking about good old American laziness. Do your own thinking! Do your own research! Don't trust the information you get from someone else, because these are matters too serious to be left in the hands of others. We abolished slavery long ago for good reasons - would you let your body belong to someone else? So why allow your mind to be likewise owned?

Own liberty. Live liberty. Be liberty.

Update: The Number One

Extra special thanks to zziggysgal, who forged ahead into brave new territory when she left this blog's very first comments. For everyone else (all four of you): come on now, there's no reason to be shy. The ice has been broken, full speed ahead. Subscribe! Comment! Frolic in the cybermist!

In the meantime, here's something to chew on...

Fortune

In case you can't read the fine print on my fortune through the lens on my phone, it says, "Present your best ideas today to an eager and welcoming audience." Aren't you fortunate. And no, I'm not telling you my lucky numbers.

Kevlar v2.0

Ok, my precious little nobodies, I just got serious.

See the sexy little subscribe link over there? You can now subscribe to this blog, all 21st century style, via many many many different fancy options.

Don't like options? Subscribe via e-mail, you luddite. I'll still love you.

The Number Zero

I've noticed a trend: ZERO people have made comments on my beloved blog. Now this may be inaccurate due to a margin of error of +/- 50 million people or so. Actually, I hope this is the case, because in my opinion it would be a little bit neato if a negative-sum person made a comment. It would be a wonderful scientific example of anti-matter, about which I could inform my kids.

Ok, but there's quite a bit of consistency here. Zero. Zero. Zero. Zero. Not even a friggin' vote on my survey. C'mon! Now I know this is a youngster in the Great Blogosphere, but I have told a few of you about it - you know, the ones I like - and curiously, the number is unchanged: Zero.

This is actually one of the things that drove me (screaming profanities) away from the Networking sites of the current social order. (Poke me? Poke ME? Poke YOU.) I would post things, be they silly or serious, and no one - again, ZERO - would comment. I would then take that as some kind of commentary on my social standing in the minds of my Friends, and be moved to tears over their apathy.

But now I know better. Since this Blog pretty much contains less than 8.1% of Me (as defined by Top Friends, movie preferences, and Blingin' Layouts), I can finally rest assured that it had very little to do with ME, specifically. It wasn't about the container at all - it's just that no one actually CARED about interacting with what I had to say. I know that now, because once all the silly business is stripped away (and let's be honest, sending people hugs and jockeying our Top Friends around does not the world a better place make), the result is the same.

And you know what? That's ok with me. Strangely enough, I am content to send my voice out into the void of the cyberwhatsis. I know that one day, 20 generations into the future, a vast and alien intelligence will discover my writings floating around in the netherspace, and will mount a search among my descendents for a hint of the DNA that made their ancient progenitor great and sagacious.

In the meantime... would someone just leave a comment? Please? You're hurting my feelings, and I've simply run out of tears.

Public Service Announcement

A Magician's Election

What difference does it make who gets elected to the office of President of the United States, or any other office for that matter, if we can't be certain that the election process is legitimate? Time and time again I see reports of ballots being counted in secret, of voters being told they're not on the official party roster, of voting machines malfunctioning... These are good accounts, documented by witnesses or even better, by video.

Why do we allow these sorts of things to happen? Do we trust those who hold the keys to power? Trust is dead, my friends. It may be revived, but for now, we must pay our last respects and move on.

Magicians know how to fool us by combining deception with distraction. The rabbit appears in front of us because we assume we know where and when to look. And yet... where the hell did that rabbit come from?

There should be no voting machines. There should be full public accountablility of the ballots and the ballot-counting process. This accountability is a requirement of a legitimate representative democracy. The ballots should not be out of sight, not even for a moment. Until we demand these things, our elected officials are nothing more than rabbits pulled out of hats.

Comedy Hour

Laugh and smirk and giggle, Mr. McCain. You too, Mr. Romney. Everything is just so damn funny.

One million dead Iraqis is a hilarious topic. The collapse of the US economy is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. And the fact that someone has the guts to point it all out - oh yeah, that old propeller-head is a riot. Everyone be nice to the amusing old crank, just let him finish his addle-brained discourse and let the real business commence. You know the kind of work I'm talking about, the serious work, like the socialization of a once-great republic, the debate about who really means it when they say Kill the Terrorists, the hoodwinking of America's citizenry as our dollar is burned away right in front of our eyes... That's the kind of stuff real men are made of. Strong men, solid men like you, Mr. McCain, and you, Mr. Romney. How patient you are as that silly old coot speaks of trite things like deficit spending, causes of inflation, why countries hate us, the mathematics of an Empire, and that ridiculously worn out document he just goes on and on about! What did he call it again? Oh yes, the Constitution, just about as dusty as he is.

You too, Mr. Huckabee. Your feigned innocence, your flag-draped cross... It's such a good thing that your advisor on foreign policy is none other than the President of the Council on Foreign Relations. If you were President of the United States, I could rest easy knowing that the man sworn to uphold our Constitution takes counsel from an organization interested in the dissolution of national sovereignties. Brilliant!

As funny and pious as the lot of you are... I will never, ever vote for you. You three offer nothing but more of the same nonsense that put us squarely in the lap of ruin in the first place. You are a brood of vipers, and it is my hope that my brothers and sisters in Liberty wake up to this truth before it is too late. I hope that we as a nation have the eyes to see you and your ilk for what you are - poison and disaster.

Lights

Money Ex Nihilo

"The $3 trillion Bush's proposes spending in 2009 would be the first time that milestone has been reached. Bush also presided over the first budget to hit $2 trillion, in 2002. It took the government nearly 200 years to reach the first $1 trillion budget, which occurred in 1987 during the Reagan administration." - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080203/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_budget_32

It's stuff like this that makes me need to blog.

Welcome aboard.